Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:07:31 +0200 From: fandino <fandino@ng.fadesa.es> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3b7and poor ata performance Message-ID: <41753BC3.80807@ng.fadesa.es> In-Reply-To: <20041019120050.uscwo4c8kco4g44s@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz> References: <20041015190638.C5A0E5D04@ptavv.es.net> <41715E7F.7060509@ng.fadesa.es> <20041018100045.f8koww0skcco0woo@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz> <4173D66F.6010200@DeepCore.dk> <4173F2E9.7010407@ng.fadesa.es> <417406E3.9010706@DeepCore.dk> <4174FD04.8040000@ng.fadesa.es> <20041019104525.ikgw8kcw8sw480os@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz> <20041019155848.GA55255@xor.obsecurity.org> <20041019120050.uscwo4c8kco4g44s@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kenneth Culver wrote: > Quoting Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>: > >> On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 10:45:25AM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote: >> >>> This is with a custom kernel with all debugging options off. I >>> haven't seen a >>> mail from you yet that says whether you turned off debugging options >>> in the >>> kernel or not, and if you haven't turned off debugging options, I'd >>> strongly >>> suggest doing so. >> >> >> In fact he's said so several times. >> >> Kris > > > OK, well I must've missed it then and I apologize for that, however, I > still > don't see any reason why his hardware would perform so much worse than > mine, > aside from the something being wrong with his hardware setup, or the > driver for > his particular ata chip. If that was so, why OpenBSD, Linux (and windows) outperform FreeBSD? They are almost two times faster than FBSD, using the same hardware.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41753BC3.80807>