From owner-dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org Fri May 21 07:03:53 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: dev-commits-src-all@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC494652D2F; Fri, 21 May 2021 07:03:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fmcyx49gQz53r3; Fri, 21 May 2021 07:03:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Received: from Stefans-MBP-449.fritz.box (p200300cd5f135c00cd477658b2baa9e2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:cd:5f13:5c00:cd47:7658:b2ba:a9e2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: se/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF82A1AF3; Fri, 21 May 2021 07:03:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) To: Joe Clarke , Benjamin Kaduk , Zhenlei Huang Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" , Lutz Donnerhacke , src-committers , dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org References: <202105182101.14IL1Gki054229@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <20210519055407.GA9715@belenus.iks-jena.de> <10b475c5-0100-2567-4e92-73b168b97e3f@marcuscom.com> <1DD8ABB9-94B1-4B44-8003-25432A91D520@gmail.com> <5cee6177-8b75-382e-cd3a-403397de0190@marcuscom.com> From: Stefan Esser Subject: Re: git: 3d846e48227e - main - Do not forward datagrams originated by link-local addresses Message-ID: <1c001c3f-191e-c761-0eb4-ff78171af580@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 09:03:46 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5cee6177-8b75-382e-cd3a-403397de0190@marcuscom.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="j1LGn9wI3ZymfDQKB09AngNlOVIbFtVyC" X-BeenThere: dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Commit messages for all branches of the src repository List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 07:03:53 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --j1LGn9wI3ZymfDQKB09AngNlOVIbFtVyC Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="DF8bNBci5TbMCjIAIqDsY7evhLh1k4PBa"; protected-headers="v1" From: Stefan Esser To: Joe Clarke , Benjamin Kaduk , Zhenlei Huang Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" , Lutz Donnerhacke , src-committers , dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1c001c3f-191e-c761-0eb4-ff78171af580@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: git: 3d846e48227e - main - Do not forward datagrams originated by link-local addresses References: <202105182101.14IL1Gki054229@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <20210519055407.GA9715@belenus.iks-jena.de> <10b475c5-0100-2567-4e92-73b168b97e3f@marcuscom.com> <1DD8ABB9-94B1-4B44-8003-25432A91D520@gmail.com> <5cee6177-8b75-382e-cd3a-403397de0190@marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <5cee6177-8b75-382e-cd3a-403397de0190@marcuscom.com> --DF8bNBci5TbMCjIAIqDsY7evhLh1k4PBa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 20.05.21 um 15:07 schrieb Joe Clarke: > On 5/19/21 22:39, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: >> Sorry, RFCs themselves do not change -- one of the distinctive feature= s of >> RFCs is precisely that they are immutable once published. >> The sentiment that what the current RFC for a given topic is, can chan= ge, is >> something that I can agree with, but that's not quite what was being >> discussed. >=20 > Agreed, which is why I say the reference still has value and one can us= e > it as a basis to follow the errata and newer docs. That said, I've > expressed my desire to leave the reference in, and I'll leave it at > that. I didn't think this would be that controversial. And, adding to that: if somebody works on a code fragment with reference to an RFC that has been replaced by a newer one known by the committer, then updating that reference might be considered a service for future readers of that code ... Regards, STefan --DF8bNBci5TbMCjIAIqDsY7evhLh1k4PBa-- --j1LGn9wI3ZymfDQKB09AngNlOVIbFtVyC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsB5BAABCAAjFiEEo3HqZZwL7MgrcVMTR+u171r99UQFAmCnW1MFAwAAAAAACgkQR+u171r99UT6 DAf/TAe2xt6ykdkb2BJ9ErhKYUt0J0GT6CgAt056HGa4Cebe5WtXc6QmLJCo3bYFJ++kfcRlN8HN jgRFjSWqNZ88vj6WCfDDKBnkifG7R3yzKSFJPOSMhBcC9JwkQGJPxzNF9poxHkD2hN0iDdP8OSuh pdjG2OCS5EABrXwrtInDOMsEnVcY9manGuZV66RPF2Qpw3nNEkqo3ubGCJLhMqY/tRvVEZ4KVOr7 /xXJ5d21Vmcz6i3EGwZ5wsoTkVc1XJs/n9OUjXc9Zl1hL22CL2yiVmUYQ96k3Rh9Fh9UGoubatEm w+J3gAa6KOP3Wom+TTCiltaMI7dIQdg8idZkhjD12w== =vVOq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --j1LGn9wI3ZymfDQKB09AngNlOVIbFtVyC--