From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Oct 24 21:12:22 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA11086 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 24 Oct 1997 21:12:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA11081 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 1997 21:12:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id VAA07238; Fri, 24 Oct 1997 21:12:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 1997 21:12:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White Reply-To: Doug White To: John Kelly cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 48 meg double fault moved to 64 meg in 2.2.5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 24 Oct 1997, John Kelly wrote: > I have two machines with identical hardware configurations. > Intel 486DX4-100, VLB motherboard with UMC chipset, Buslogic > 445C SCSI controller, 64 MB RAM. > > The problem appears on both machines. > > I also have a test machine, another VLB 486 with 64 MB RAM, > but a VIA chipset and no SCSI -- No problem on this machine. > > So it seems the problem is specific to certain hardware. > > I have extra parts to build a third machine identical to the > configuration which shows the problem. In the next few days > I'll try to build one piece by piece until the problem starts. > If the problem starts with the motherboard itself I'll poke > around with the CMOS settings to see if they have any effect. Keep us posted. If you find anything consistent, you should send it using send-pr and maybe followup to hackers@freebsd.org. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major