Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 22 Jul 2009 22:22:35 +0200
From:      Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>
To:        Igor Mozolevsky <igor@hybrid-lab.co.uk>
Cc:        Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: llvm/clang a tool chain or just a compiler for FreeBSD?
Message-ID:  <20090722202235.GA28313@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <a2b6592c0907220852h4eba5c6bpdebe1d7dcd7ef94a@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <2e566b9e0907202134h5568a06bl33a8d95ac9c7f845@mail.gmail.com> <20090721131735.GA18929@freebsd.org> <2e566b9e0907211818k1a52ef7am5c681a6f4ffc868c@mail.gmail.com> <864ot5jy3f.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20090722141756.GQ55190@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <a2b6592c0907220852h4eba5c6bpdebe1d7dcd7ef94a@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 04:52:58PM +0100, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
> 2009/7/22 Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>:
> 
> > I believe that the nearest action that is quite reasonable and
> > profitable by its own merit is divorcing base compiler and compiler used
> > to build ports. Even if this means that we would "only" have different
> > versions of gcc.
> 
> 
> On a similar note, has anyone one tried clang + yasm?

I did.. it does not work.... and there is no future in this.
clang/llvm is getting native elf writer/assembler really soon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090722202235.GA28313>