From owner-freebsd-chat Fri Jun 6 12:23:50 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA06030 for chat-outgoing; Fri, 6 Jun 1997 12:23:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from marlin.exis.net (root@marlin.exis.net [205.252.72.102]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA06025 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 1997 12:23:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sailfish.exis.net (sailfish.exis.net [205.252.72.104]) by marlin.exis.net (8.8.4/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA22481; Fri, 6 Jun 1997 15:07:56 -0400 Date: Fri, 6 Jun 1997 11:05:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Molnar To: "Pedro F. Giffuni" cc: "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" , Jim Dixon , freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re:UNIX vs NT In-Reply-To: <3398711D.699C@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > And now back to the theme... > Yeah, OS2 is a very cool product and has always been ages ahead of M$, > but their marketing and technical support sucks :(. The marketing and tech does kinda have something less than to be desired. I think of it this way, the majority of ATM machines use OS/2. I like it. But that is coming from a guy that has a OS/2 Warp Server with SMP doing an NFS mount to a FBSDbox. Stefan "...Alll things are good, esp. an axe to a troubled server." -Said while on a caffeine high