From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 27 03:55:25 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BCCF1065675 for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:55:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bab@acciodata.com) Received: from mail.acciodata.com (host34.acciodata.com [207.200.31.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 297D08FC1E for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:55:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bab@acciodata.com) Received: from bravo.acciodata.com (root@bravo [10.1.5.2]) by mail.acciodata.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m7R3KY5A039744 for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:20:34 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bab@acciodata.com) Received: from bravo.acciodata.com (bab@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bravo.acciodata.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m7R3KXVl031204 for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:20:33 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bab@bravo.acciodata.com) Received: (from bab@localhost) by bravo.acciodata.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m7R3KXNc031201; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:20:33 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bab) From: Barry Boes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18612.51201.285688.628405@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:20:33 -0500 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 20) "Double Solitaire" XEmacs Lucid X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 04:40:09 +0000 Subject: kvm on amd64 - >6G? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: barry.boes@acciodata.com List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:55:25 -0000 With the advent of ZFS, Solaris users are devoting 30G or more to their ARC caches today. If FreeBSD 8 is going to up the KVM size, is there a reason to not increase the limit to something that will not be reached in the lifetime of 8? 100GB? -Barry