From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 9 23:30:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE7616A4CE for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 23:30:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD13943D2D for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 23:30:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iA9NUeeD032934 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 23:30:40 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id iA9NUeGE032933; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 23:30:40 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 23:30:40 GMT Message-Id: <200411092330.iA9NUeGE032933@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org From: Herve Quiroz Subject: Re: kern/63621: [usb] USB MemoryStick Reader stalls/crashes system X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Herve Quiroz List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 23:30:40 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/63621; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Herve Quiroz To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, marck@rinet.ru Cc: Subject: Re: kern/63621: [usb] USB MemoryStick Reader stalls/crashes system Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 00:26:31 +0100 Hum, after some more testing (well, unexpected crashes actually) it seems like the cat(1) trick is not necessarily the true workaround. Sometimes, even this trick fails to have subsequent read accesses working. But maybe it's just a matter of un-mounting and re-mouting the filesystem... Indeed, I need to perform some more tests but I've been doing this with 100% succes so far: 1. mount 2. cat file.txt 3. un-mount 4. re-mount 5. do whatever I want, even subversion operations Actually, I still pray each time I do a simple svn update. But statistically, this gives me the best results. Dmitry, could you try this method to confirm? BTW, I've just upgraded to 5.3-RELEASE last night so we'll see in a short while if the problem is still relevant with this version. Herve