From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 20 17:02:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77FB416AF7B for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:02:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A0B13C491 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:02:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.ntplx.net (8.14.0/8.14.0/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id l1KGkX0a003698; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:46:33 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.ntplx.net) X-Greylist: Message whitelisted by DRAC access database, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]); Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:46:33 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:46:33 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: Martin Blapp In-Reply-To: <20070220174221.B4139@godot.imp.ch> Message-ID: References: <20070220153632.E4139@godot.imp.ch> <20070220174221.B4139@godot.imp.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: rob@debank.tv, freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.2-Release and Clamd 0.90 with libpthread.so X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:02:30 -0000 On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, Martin Blapp wrote: > > Hi, > >> Probably because it's fork()ing and trying to call >> non-async-signal-safe functions without doing an exec()? > > The strange thing is that I can't see any any fork() calls > with libc_r or libthr. How's that possible ? Or do you think > that its stuck at the beginning ? But why does it work then > for some degree ? I dunno, maybe ktrace was confused and it wasn't a fork()? -- DE