Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 13:57:31 -0700 From: Jamie Norwood <mistwolf@ethereal.net> To: "Richard G. Roberto" <robertor@typhoon.co.jp> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Problems with GDBM on FreeBSD 3.2-R Message-ID: <19990715135731.A19609@ethereal.net> In-Reply-To: <19990715135048.A18252@ethereal.net>; from Jamie Norwood on Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 01:50:48PM -0700 References: <19990714213140.A3636@ethereal.net> <99071519240800.06507@robertor.typhoon.co.jp> <19990715135048.A18252@ethereal.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
OK, I got it in to ldconfig... It appears that ldconfig will not read any library who either has no .so.X file, or who's .so.X is too long. So I had: -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 457 Jul 14 21:09 libgdbm.la lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 14 Jul 14 21:09 libgdbm.so -> libgdbm.so.2.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 25353 Jul 14 21:09 libgdbm.so.2.0 Since libgdbm.so.2.0 is too long, no scan. Symlinking in to add: -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 457 Jul 14 21:09 libgdbm.la lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 14 Jul 14 21:09 libgdbm.so -> libgdbm.so.2.0 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 14 Jul 15 13:55 libgdbm.so.2 -> libgdbm.so.2.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 25353 Jul 14 21:09 libgdbm.so.2.0 Fixed it, and now it is seen. Is this the expected behaviour? Or a bug? Anyone? Jamie -- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCS d- s+:+ a--(?) C++++ UB++++ P+ L--(++) E-- W++(--) N++ O? K w(---) O?>+ M?>+ V PS+ PE+ Y+ PGP->++ t+(*) 5+++ X++ R++ tv+ b+ DI++++ D++ G e>+ h--- r+++ y+++** ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990715135731.A19609>