Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 05 Feb 1997 11:37:32 -0700
From:      Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
To:        obrien@NUXI.com (David O'Brien)
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org (FreeBSD ports list), hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: conditionally including <sys/param.h> 
Message-ID:  <E0vsCDt-0001VI-00@rover.village.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 05 Feb 1997 00:33:43 PST." <19970205003343.YB13323@dragon.nuxi.com> 
References:  <19970205003343.YB13323@dragon.nuxi.com>  <19970202135048.PN07710@dragon.nuxi.com> <199701280143.RAA06503@freefall.freebsd.org> <Pine.OSF.3.95q.970127210526.2115E-100000@uplink.eng.umd.edu> <E0vrw2G-0000I7-00@rover.village.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <19970205003343.YB13323@dragon.nuxi.com> David O'Brien writes:
: Then what would you suggest?  Are they really more different than all the
: various sysVr4 that define __svr4__?  How close is Solaris, UnixWare, and
: Irix?

BTW, Solaris 2.5.1 with Sun Soft's 4.0 compiler doesn't define
__svr4__.  It defines __SVR4.

Warner



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E0vsCDt-0001VI-00>