From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 27 02:33:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9114E16A4CE for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 02:33:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A4E43D49 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 02:33:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ADBEB513B1; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:33:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:33:43 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Anish Mistry Message-ID: <20050427023343.GA55926@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <17006.19740.605509.984940@roam.psg.com> <200504261135.07833.mistry.7@osu.edu> <5bbfe7d405042618404e7a6521@mail.gmail.com> <200504262200.17379.mistry.7@osu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200504262200.17379.mistry.7@osu.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: Randy Bush cc: David Leimbach cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ule+preempt? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 02:33:45 -0000 --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 10:00:17PM -0400, Anish Mistry wrote: > On Tuesday 26 April 2005 09:40 pm, David Leimbach wrote: > > On 4/26/05, Anish Mistry wrote: > > > On Tuesday 26 April 2005 10:15 am, Randy Bush wrote: > > > > having been seriously burned, i have avoided ule for some > > > > months. i am wondering if the waters have become relatively > > > > safe to go to ule with preemption? > > > > > > I've been running it for few weeks and it seems to be fine for > > > now, but YMMV. > > > > Are you on an SMP box? I have a feeling it's pretty good on a UP > > machine > > > I'm on on UP. Running on SMP will probably reveal the squishy=20 > underbelly to which Kris was referring. I'd expect the same problems to appear less frequently on UP, but with a non-zero probability. Kris --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCbvoHWry0BWjoQKURAhOfAJ9ZTDdz2iEgTTKf04ncteyTTYByNgCgzDPY v+vUR4fZrFIjiFucTvfUdNo= =0wVI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7--