From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Mar 2 14:46:42 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA07568 for chat-outgoing; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 14:46:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA07562 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 14:46:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA07379; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 14:46:26 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199703022246.OAA07379@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96 To: Charles Henrich cc: scrappy@hub.org (The Hermit Hacker), ejs@bfd.com, jmb@freefall.freebsd.org, jkh@time.cdrom.com, taob@risc.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.2 Compiler slower than 2.1? (was RSA 56-bit key challenge) In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 02 Mar 1997 17:36:04 EST." <199703022236.RAA01021@crh.cl.msu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 02 Mar 1997 14:46:26 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Which brings the interesting point since gcc in 3.0-current is inefficient should we also recompile msun on a 2.1 system for PPRO systems? Who knows we may be able to break the 400k keys/sec before the end of the day 8) Amancio >From The Desk Of Charles Henrich : > > On Sun, 2 Mar 1997, Charles Henrich wrote: > > > > > Hmm the one amancio put up seems like the old one. Try the one at > > > ftp.scnc.k12.mi.us/pub/misc/rc5-56-freebsd > > > > > Same results, but you mentioned something about new math libs? > > I'm running 3.0-current over here (well, current as far as before all > > the lite2 instabilities)... > > You need to rebuild /usr/lib/msun after editing /etc/make.conf to enable > HAVE_FPU > > -Crh > > Charles Henrich Michigan State University henrich@msu.edu > > http://pilot.msu.edu/~henrich