From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jan 13 13:57:56 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id NAA08830 for bugs-outgoing; Mon, 13 Jan 1997 13:57:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from sax.sax.de (sax.sax.de [193.175.26.33]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id NAA08823 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 1997 13:57:51 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by sax.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id WAA20595; Mon, 13 Jan 1997 22:56:12 +0100 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.8.4/8.6.9) id WAA03088; Mon, 13 Jan 1997 22:32:26 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1997 22:32:26 +0100 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: gurney_j@efn.org Cc: freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org, toor@dyson.iquest.net (John S. Dyson) Subject: Re: bin/2466 Re: bin/2466: telnet sleeps too much :-) References: <199701122300.PAA29644@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Mutt 0.55-PL10 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) In-Reply-To: <199701122300.PAA29644@freefall.freebsd.org>; from John-Mark Gurney on Jan 12, 1997 15:00:01 -0800 Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As John-Mark Gurney wrote: > oh... this is unrelated... but gnats-submit doesn't pass along the > reply-to: that you (Joerg) normally have.. just noticed this.. Yep, you're right. Next time i'm on freefall, i'll look at it. > I can do it over here... just like he says... I sent a message to > hackers reciently about this... but didn't get a response... That's simply because nobody has an explanation yet, even though some people have experienced that problem. > ok... I got it... the dumped file is 73k... I just managed to reproduce > it... it seems to happen when the process (telnet) gets swapped out... the Hmmm. That's a first sign (and also explains why it happens only if the session is idle for some time). It seems to be irrelevant whether swapping is via NFS or local disks, since some reports are for the latter situation (and to the contrary, i haven't seen this yet on my diskless box). John, perhaps you've got an idea? -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)