Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 15:21:05 +0900 From: JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: m_tag leak? Message-ID: <y7v64nzeh0u.wl%jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <43DF661E.8A08C7EF@freebsd.org> References: <y7vlkwweek0.wl%jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> <43DF661E.8A08C7EF@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:29:02 +0100, >>>>> Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> said: >> Doesn't this mean an m_tag attached to the mbuf to be freed, if any, >> will remain without any reference? Perhaps I'm missing something very >> trivial. It would be appreciated if someone could clarify that. > This is indeed non-obvious and scattered around but happens correctly. > Have a look at kern/kern_mbuf.c:mb_dtor_mbuf(). Ah, I see. Thanks for the prompt answer. JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?y7v64nzeh0u.wl%jinmei>