From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 8 00:58:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E7D16A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 00:58:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.corrupt.co.nz (222-152-1-143.jetstream.xtra.co.nz [222.152.1.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A6CE043D1D for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 00:58:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drew@corrupt.co.nz) Received: (qmail 6299 invoked by uid 1011); 8 Jul 2004 00:58:43 -0000 Received: from drew@corrupt.co.nz by tweety.lan.corrupt.co.nz by uid 1009 with qmail-scanner-1.22 Clear:RC:0(192.100.53.164):SA:0(0.0/3.8):. Processed in 5.405138 secs); 08 Jul 2004 00:58:43 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 Received: from 192.100.53.164.dts.net.nz (HELO ?192.168.63.100?) (drew@corrupt.co.nz@192.100.53.164) by mail.corrupt.co.nz with SMTP; 8 Jul 2004 00:58:37 -0000 Message-ID: <40EC9C02.9020107@corrupt.co.nz> Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 12:57:38 +1200 From: Drew Broadley User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040606) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Oliver Eikemeier References: <57C54530-D054-11D8-8006-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> In-Reply-To: <57C54530-D054-11D8-8006-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: current@freebsd.org cc: Colin Percival Subject: Re: bringing /etc/services up to date X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 00:58:46 -0000 Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > Drew Broadley wrote: > >> Colin Percival wrote: >> >>> I've put together a patch to bring /etc/services up to date with >>> almost a decade of IANA port assignments. Unfortunately, this >>> turned out to be rather larger than I expected: It adds 6400 lines, >>> and increases the size of /etc/services from 73 kB to 327 kB. >>> Is anyone going to be very unhappy if I go ahead and commit this? >>> >>> Colin Percival >>> >> What are the netstat calls to /etc/services like with the update, any >> performance decrease ? >> >> (I cannot think of any other application that uses them off the top >> of my head) > > > inetd(8) for example. > > -Oliver Posted that STRAIGHT after :) - Drew