Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 10:36:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jeremy C. Reed" <reed@reedmedia.net> To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Negative Review of FreeBSD 5.4 Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0506021032490.30239-100000@pilchuck.reedmedia.net> In-Reply-To: <429F4244.2040207@pacific.net.sg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Erich Dollansky wrote: > It was not the best move to declare 5.3 usable for production. Not even 5.4. I help maintain various FreeBSD 5.x boxes for now over two years in various locations used in essential production environments. I teach FreeBSD classes in various locations, and so I have also had the great opportunity to assist with installing FreeBSD 5.x on probably over 50 different computer systems -- a wide variety of different hardware. FreeBSD 5.x has installed well and performed well for me going back to January 2003. Jeremy C. Reed open source, Unix, *BSD, Linux training http://www.pugetsoundtechnology.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.43.0506021032490.30239-100000>