From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Apr  7 20:10:47 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.9])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC9E1513A
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed,  7 Apr 1999 20:10:43 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bde@godzilla.zeta.org.au)
Received: (from bde@localhost)
	by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA02002;
	Thu, 8 Apr 1999 13:08:29 +1000
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 13:08:29 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199904080308.NAA02002@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: ache@nagual.pp.ru, jdp@polstra.com
Subject: Re: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os
Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>> it seems that boot2 needs to be reduced, and I don't know why it becomes
>> that big and what can be reduced. First candidates are static cmd[512] and
>> kernel[1024]. Please fix so it can be still compiled with gcc.
>
>Why?  The compiler in -current is egcs, not gcc.  If  you want to
>use the old compiler, then use the old sources for boot too.

Everything should be buildable with CC=aac (any ANSI compiler), but
that's asking too much for programs like kernels and boot blocks.

Bruce


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message