Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:40:10 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org, Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>, freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: geom <-> cam disk Message-ID: <6BF84E40-8B71-4AFD-B457-5B3299BD4F92@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <50107362.7050709@FreeBSD.org> References: <501056C4.3080806@FreeBSD.org> <23011628-17F1-49A0-A41E-E7A8A8E3EA64@samsco.org> <50107362.7050709@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jul 25, 2012, at 4:29 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > BTW, I think that it would be nice if the GEOM work-processing could re-use the > CAM model. > That is, try to execute GEOM bio transformations in the original thread as much > as possible, defer work to the GEOM thread as the last resort. Lots of people would like to see this. Especially people that want high iops. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6BF84E40-8B71-4AFD-B457-5B3299BD4F92>