From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 07:23:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7817C16A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:23:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.butovo-online.ru (mail.b-o.ru [212.5.78.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A8843D54 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:23:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from resident@b-o.ru) Received: from [212.5.78.81] (helo=212.5.78.81) by mail.butovo-online.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Bq5RJ-000FXQ-6N; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:34:57 +0400 Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:25:27 +0400 From: Andrew Riabtsev X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62i) Business X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1591601893.20040729112527@b-o.ru> To: Max Laier In-Reply-To: <200407282346.12412.max@love2party.net> References: <41081955.5090204@schluting.com> <200407282346.12412.max@love2party.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: packet order, ipf or ipfw (offtopic) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Andrew Riabtsev List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:23:04 -0000 Hello Max, Thursday, July 29, 2004, 1:46:06 AM, you wrote: ML> Another alternative (on FreeBSD-current) would be pf+ALTQ, btw ;) Is there any chance to see one day pf for 4.X-RELEASE? I'm still thinking pf is the best firewall ever made but it is very frustrated i can't use it on freeBSD boxes. :( Is there some serios problem on porting pf to 4.X-RELEASE? Or it's just a question of free time? -- Best regards, Andrew mailto:resident@b-o.ru