From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr  6 18:26:44 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAAFE16A405;
	Fri,  6 Apr 2007 18:26:44 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from sakura.ninth-nine.com (sakura.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.120])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E84913C4BE;
	Fri,  6 Apr 2007 18:26:44 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mail.ninth-nine.com ([IPv6:2001:3e0:4cf:1:d2:ff:fe23:1b4])
	(authenticated bits=0) by sakura.ninth-nine.com
	(8.13.8/8.13.8/NinthNine) with ESMTP id l36IQhQT052265
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Sat, 7 Apr 2007 03:26:43 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 03:26:43 +0900
From: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org>
To: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <20070407032643.72fd55df.nork@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <200704061351.30424.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
References: <20070407023855.ede13b76.nork@FreeBSD.org>
	<200704061351.30424.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.0beta7 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by
	milter-greylist-2.0.2 (sakura.ninth-nine.com
	[IPv6:2001:3e0:4cf:0:230:48ff:fe41:2455]);
	Sat, 07 Apr 2007 03:26:43 +0900 (JST)
Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: Cannot mount linprocfs by unresolving sysvs?m symbols
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 18:26:44 -0000

On Fri, 6 Apr 2007 13:51:20 -0400
Jung-uk Kim <jkim@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > --- linprocfs.c	30 Mar 2007 17:56:44 -0000	1.108
> > +++ linprocfs.c	6 Apr 2007 17:33:05 -0000
> > @@ -1238,3 +1238,5 @@
> >  PSEUDOFS(linprocfs, 1);
> >  MODULE_DEPEND(linprocfs, linux, 1, 1, 1);
> >  MODULE_DEPEND(linprocfs, procfs, 1, 1, 1);
> > +MODULE_DEPEND(linprocfs, sysvmsg, 1, 1, 1);
> > +MODULE_DEPEND(linprocfs, sysvsem, 1, 1, 1);
> Looks good.  I will commit it shortly.
> BTW, 'linux' module depends on these modules.  Is loading 'dependency 
> of dependency' broken?  Should we have to explicitly tell it to load 
> the dependencies?  Am I missing something here? :-(

	'dependency of dependency' you saied is not broken.  It's
	specification:-) of kernel symbol resolver.  It can resolve
	one level export symbols:-(.