Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:59:31 +0930
From:      "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Cc:        Clifton Royston <cliftonr@lava.net>
Subject:   Re: Sticky/sgid/suid bits safe on regular files?
Message-ID:  <200406221659.31501.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <xzpisdkkqru.fsf@dwp.des.no>
References:  <20040617205549.GA19254@lava.net> <xzpisdkkqru.fsf@dwp.des.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:45, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote:
> Clifton Royston <cliftonr@lava.net> writes:
> > I need to add a feature to an application where it can keep tabs on
> > whether one specific action has ever been taken on any given file, one
> > of possibly hundreds of thousands of a dynamically changing file set.
>
> man extattr

I think he wanted to use sticky/sgid/suid because they get removed when the=
=20
file is changed so the application can go back and see if they've been=20
changed. That doesn't happen to attributes.

Also, I don't think attributes work over NFS(?)

=2D --=20
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFA19/b5ZPcIHs/zowRAu6YAKCLvYy9Ozy0flatbqdd11xA7YLDOwCgqtcD
/JdlWxeXWPxnd3qaTU6pb9A=3D
=3DsH9/
=2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200406221659.31501.doconnor>