From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 22 08:01:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3028106566B for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 08:01:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jayton.garnett@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f214.google.com (mail-bw0-f214.google.com [209.85.218.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 515748FC13 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 08:01:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz6 with SMTP id 6so893662bwz.31 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:01:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=3NW+6RhMqYKqkMJtFOtPuTNmNXA6mM14sMitrXrTim0=; b=gWqyYwmDBSeU7gsfRT4HzZoqqtuRUxifDT0uQTwqsBAQpNyttNqtfY4AjnHz/vFdvK 85grrumWtfJFk0WUdIAaRxlF2t+hQXyK6xjMLUMasphQb6fkFcuZnIFk8LFBtX6I+Y5h hqcBtfu8GUXg2BpZymS9xCVw0KZ/ORWevoPDc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=n7oYbXSPpLiq0W02Sn5U1cTpSAyddepejsbmrop3QzLYw/AOhww/3NGEtFyCiXMO+t QYCHxy4KriYs6tmbhvp7N0zfsV8SZdvWCAoVoQN3a/qHsP8zziKpZBwT8a4ja5tw0Hy7 k1j0HozKz9iMKLwzXL0VTLQKcJ6e5wprzmqVo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.155.78 with SMTP id r14mr1364908bkw.201.1264147279090; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:01:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B58AC75.3090100@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> References: <4B58AC75.3090100@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 08:01:18 +0000 Message-ID: From: Jayton Garnett To: Programmer In Training Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Chat Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux vs. Win2k X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 08:01:20 -0000 It would be interesting to get these stats performed by someone who is OS-Neutral. Suffice to say Windows 7 is on par with XP's performance on the same hardware, even with all the bells and whistles turned on. Jay