Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 19:59:37 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely7.cicely.de>, freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org>, ticso@cicely.de Subject: Re: wandboard / imx6 / exynos4 / cortex-a9 "wrong-endian bug" fixed Message-ID: <1584FD9C-581F-4BCF-8153-E381693887DB@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <1391395062.13026.69.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> References: <1391371204.13026.43.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <20140202230450.GA42331@cicely7.cicely.de> <CAB3ij4AjkrMfF2YLrjTE5vZx25XT%2B2iTSghKG=kh8iu==XeZ2w@mail.gmail.com> <1391395062.13026.69.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Feb 2, 2014, at 7:37 PM, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Sun, 2014-02-02 at 18:25 -0700, Tom Everett wrote: >> I can confirm that a crochet image for Wandboard no longer crashes = after >> this fix. It doesn't mount the FS yet, but that's a known issue, = noted >> here: >>=20 >> https://github.com/kientzle/crochet-freebsd/issues/29 >=20 > That thread mentions needing to build a u-boot for wandboard. Here's = a > patchset for doing that. Apply this in your ports/sysutils dir, = using: >=20 > patch -p0 <u-boot-wandboard.diff >=20 > This was copied from Tim's beaglebone work and changed a bit for > wandboard. =20 >=20 > I've been meaning to ask about how we should handle this. Do we want = a > u-boot port for every board, or is there some way to parameterize a > single port so that it applies the right set of patches, or what? I'm > not very savvy about ports. Usually there's a master port, and slave ports that parameterize. When = we talked about this at BSDcan, I believe that was the model that was = suggested for this problem.. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1584FD9C-581F-4BCF-8153-E381693887DB>