From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 22 09:10:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0439116A41C for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:10:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ertr1013@student.uu.se) Received: from pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A1F43D58 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:10:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ertr1013@student.uu.se) Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (212.181.162.201) by pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (7.2.059.6) id 429C53B60053EB0E for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:10:55 +0200 Received: (qmail 34379 invoked by uid 1001); 22 Jun 2005 11:10:55 +0200 Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:10:54 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: Harrison Peter CSA BIRKENHEAD Message-ID: <20050622091054.GA34367@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Harrison Peter CSA BIRKENHEAD , Chuck Swiger , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: -DNOPROFILE with make buildworld... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:10:58 -0000 On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 09:46:11AM +0100, Harrison Peter CSA BIRKENHEAD wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chuck Swiger [mailto:cswiger@mac.com] > > Sent: 21 June 2005 19:25 > > To: Roland Smith > > Cc: Harrison Peter CSA BIRKENHEAD; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: Re: -DNOPROFILE with make buildworld... > > [snip] > > > Normally, you don't use the profiled versions of libraries > > unless you are > > running a binary which links against them. If you are > > running a binary which > > has not been compiled with profiling, the toolchain will link > > it against normal > > versions of the libraries. > > > Most of the apps I'm running have been compiled from ports against > the stock 5.3-RELEASE libraries. Are the stock libraries profiling or > not? No. > Would I have had to explicitly set an option to compile ports to > link against profiling libraries? Yes. > Is it therefore a reasonable > assumption that if I didn't specifically make any binaries profiling, > then they'll be not-profiling? Yes. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se