From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 4 17:36:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8119B106564A; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 17:36:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu) Received: from khavrinen.csail.mit.edu (khavrinen.csail.mit.edu [128.30.28.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430638FC08; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 17:36:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from khavrinen.csail.mit.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by khavrinen.csail.mit.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pA4HP3ek017279 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL CN=khavrinen.csail.mit.edu issuer=Client+20CA); Fri, 4 Nov 2011 13:25:03 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.csail.mit.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id pA4HP3Ii017276; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 13:25:03 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20148.8175.685844.777167@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu> Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 13:25:03 -0400 From: Garrett Wollman To: John Baldwin In-Reply-To: <4EB3DB96.3010605@FreeBSD.org> References: <201111040402.pA442oYZ000317@svn.freebsd.org> <201111040823.52084.avilla@freebsd.org> <4EB3DB96.3010605@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 22) "Instant Classic" XEmacs Lucid X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (khavrinen.csail.mit.edu [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 04 Nov 2011 13:25:03 -0400 (EDT) Cc: standards@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r227070 - in head: lib/libc/sys sys/compat/freebsd32 sys/kern sys/sys sys/vm X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Standards compliance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:36:30 -0000 < said: > It would appear that this is the last missing piece as we already > implement posix_memalign(), posix_madvise(), and posix_fallocate(). > However, there does not seem to be an easy way on opengroup.org to > definitively list all the requirements of a given POSIX option. Can > someone on standards@ chime in on if we now fully support this option? In FreeBSD we generally define the feature-test macro if we aim to support the feature in question. If somebody finds something that's missing, and the actually *use* the POSIX feature-test macros (big "if"), then they can file a bug report to tell us what's missing. -GAWollman