From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 9 08:45:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A06716A4CE for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 08:45:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from out005.verizon.net (out005pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F8A43D41 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 08:45:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com ([68.161.120.219]) by out005.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20040309164544.CQLG2677.out005.verizon.net@mac.com> for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:45:44 -0600 Message-ID: <404DF529.8040504@mac.com> Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 11:47:37 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <5.1.0.14.2.20040307224645.054f91b0@209.152.117.178> <20040308154441.GA73721@millerlite.local.mark-and-erika.com> <20040308222322.GA1353@moo.holy.cow> In-Reply-To: <20040308222322.GA1353@moo.holy.cow> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out005.verizon.net from [68.161.120.219] at Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:45:44 -0600 Subject: Re: Installation - More user friendly X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 16:45:49 -0000 Parv wrote: > in message <20040308154441.GA73721@millerlite.local.mark-and-erika.com>, > wrote Mark Frank thusly... [ ... ] > It seems the Message-ID pattern has not changed. Oops, did i say > that out loud? Yes. :-) Well, this mailing list could use a little comedy now and again-- while I cannot say that amusing other people is a goal of mine, still, we all try to do our part. -- -Chuck PS: To Rommel aka : if you've ever dealt with lawyers or that ilk, you'll rapidly encounter what are popularly called "nastygrams", which imply that horribly bad things will happen unless the receipient stops doing things you (meaning the laywer's client) don't want them to do. Nastygrams are typically sent via certified mail and look really impressive, but they generally don't mean much, unless they come from a judge. The primary purpose is to cause the receipient to have to spend lots of time and resources arguing whatever the issue may be (hopefully more than the sender does), until one side gives up. So much for justice, hmm? True, once in a while, under airtight circumstances and in an ideal black-and-white world, you'll win summary judgement...otherwise, no matter who is wrong or right, expect to waste a great deal of time (and sometimes money). [ IANAL, TINLA. ]