From owner-freebsd-questions Fri May 10 14:36:47 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id OAA26591 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 10 May 1996 14:36:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA26579 for ; Fri, 10 May 1996 14:36:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id PAA04332; Fri, 10 May 1996 15:34:28 -0600 Date: Fri, 10 May 1996 15:34:28 -0600 From: Nate Williams Message-Id: <199605102134.PAA04332@rocky.sri.MT.net> To: Terry Lambert Cc: nate@sri.MT.net (Nate Williams), tomhavbe@martin.luther.edu, questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: more ideas: HELP! In-Reply-To: <199605102046.NAA02609@phaeton.artisoft.com> References: <199605091604.KAA27926@rocky.sri.MT.net> <199605102046.NAA02609@phaeton.artisoft.com> Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > The login program uses a dynamically linked crypt authentication, > > > whereas the xdm program is (typically) statically linked. > > > > This hasn't been true since 1.0. 'xdm' has been linked shared for a > > *very* long time. However, do you have NULL passwords, since xdm won't > > allow them? > > Nate: the xdm login works, the non-xdm login doesn't. That's irelevant to the your answer. I'm 99.5% sure that xdm is linked shared, so your logic is wrong. Now, I didn't say I had the answer to why it didn't work, but xdm's linkage is *not* the problem. Nate