From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 30 09:58:42 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E71FE37B401 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:58:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spmler3.mail.eds.com (spmler3.mail.eds.com [194.128.225.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4B8C43FB1 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:58:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from thomas.sparrevohn@eds.com) Received: from spmlir2.mail.eds.com (spmlir2.mail.eds.com [205.191.69.42]) by spmler3.mail.eds.com (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3UGwLT09073; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:58:21 -0400 Received: from spmlir2.mail.eds.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spmlir2.mail.eds.com (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3UGwLY22160; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:58:21 +0100 Received: from gbspm011.exgb01.exch.eds.com ([207.37.51.203]) by spmlir2.mail.eds.com (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3UGwLO22154; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:58:21 +0100 Received: by GBSPM011 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) id ; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:58:27 +0100 Message-ID: <2946E9F05C8DD511A7DC0002A5608CE4BEC3A6@GBCHM201> From: "Sparrevohn, Thomas" To: "'Dan Nelson'" Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:58:21 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) Content-Type: text/plain cc: "'freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org'" cc: "'omestre@freeshell.org'" Subject: RE: rpc.lockd X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 16:58:43 -0000 Most likely - I noticed that I did not release the pages - but due to the other error I was trying to figure out what kept the pages inactive without releasing them. It rules out rpc.statd, Thanks -- Thomas -----Original Message----- From: Dan Nelson [mailto:dnelson@allantgroup.com] Sent: 30 April 2003 17:36 To: Sparrevohn, Thomas Cc: 'omestre@freeshell.org'; 'freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org' Subject: Re: rpc.lockd In the last episode (Apr 30), Sparrevohn, Thomas said: > After changing my FS to UFS2 yesterday I saw strange behaviour from > rpc.statd and rpc.lockd - The statd process grew to 256MB in size. > There are memory leaks some where in the 5.0-Release with UFS2 that I > did not see with UFS1 - It seems that inactive pages are never > reclaimed and on a 1GB system during a make world I ended up with 8MB > free. rpc.statd is always that size; you probably never noticed it before. It mmaps a 256MB window, but only uses a couple KB of it. http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/admin.html#STATD-MEM-LE AK -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com