From owner-freebsd-gnome  Wed Nov 20  0:20: 6 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE48037B404
	for <gnome@hub.freebsd.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:20:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B14443E3B
	for <gnome@hub.freebsd.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:20:04 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gAK8K4x3094474
	for <gnome@freefall.freebsd.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:20:04 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gAK8K48d094473;
	Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:20:04 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:20:04 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200211200820.gAK8K48d094473@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: gnome@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: ports/39417: gtk-config and glib-config filename conventions
	required?
Reply-To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-gnome.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-gnome>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-gnome>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

The following reply was made to PR ports/39417; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, brad@brad-x.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: ports/39417: gtk-config and glib-config filename conventions
	required?
Date: 20 Nov 2002 03:19:28 -0500

 --=-JUJPqPUptmWABA2aeJoU
 Content-Type: text/plain
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 Is there some pressing reason to do this other than making it look
 cleaner?  I'm not trying to be antagonistic, just don't want to
 introduce breakage in the nether regions of the ports tree if it's not a
 critical thing.  Thanks.
 
 Joe
 
 --=20
 Joe Marcus Clarke
 FreeBSD GNOME Team	::	marcus@FreeBSD.org
 http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome
 
 --=-JUJPqPUptmWABA2aeJoU
 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
 Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
 
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)
 
 iD8DBQA920WQb2iPiv4Uz4cRAqnsAJ0fWuZNU1CFV2hW3n8wlnUby1Mo9ACff/RK
 MZ4crg7Bu4j8OLzl7s+Rmug=
 =2u98
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 --=-JUJPqPUptmWABA2aeJoU--
 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message