From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Mar 27 13: 3:22 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from piranha.amis.net (piranha.amis.net [212.18.32.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76C337BC5E for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 13:03:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from blaz@amis.net) Received: from gold.amis.net (gold.amis.net [212.18.32.254]) by piranha.amis.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 155455D14; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 23:03:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 23:03:15 +0200 (CEST) From: Blaz Zupan To: Dennis Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Onboard Intel NIC In-Reply-To: <200003271926.OAA18569@etinc.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > If you dont have time then perhaps someone else should do it. THATS the > point. Sure. Nobody will complain if you start working on it! > Its an important driver. People get upset when they can't run full-duplex > mode. It makes linux MUCH more attractive when you can run your $39. card > at twice the speed. I run the Intel Etherexpress in full duplex without any problems. > Whether you are angry at me or not is no reason to punish the communiity. > If you think that you are just doing this for me because I'm the only one > with the nerve to complain then you dont understand your obligation to the > user base. OBLIGATION? Excuse me? > Plus I've already fixed it myself. So if you fix it its not for me at all. Have you contributed the fix to FreeBSD? I think I know the answer. Blaz Zupan, blaz@amis.net, http://home.amis.net/blaz/ Medinet d.o.o., Linhartova 21, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message