Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 06:21:27 +0100 From: Robert Clausecker <fuz@freebsd.org> To: Philip Paeps <philip@freebsd.org> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Time to remove sccs tags Message-ID: <ZV2P164Qhq8r7gK3@fuz.su> In-Reply-To: <22458D4C-35ED-4040-AAA1-A43006C0B32F@freebsd.org> References: <CANCZdfo5Pj=AWmd5ftZ6OmMXBrkFAbZnYZt8EC8EqRqoi9csHw@mail.gmail.com> <22458D4C-35ED-4040-AAA1-A43006C0B32F@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Philip, what(1) is part of POSIX, though I guess you can just install devel/sccs if you need it. Yours, Robert Clausecker Am Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 01:15:14PM +0800 schrieb Philip Paeps: > On 2023-11-22 00:12:48 (+0800), Warner Losh wrote: > > It's been 30 odd years since the last csrg release. They are no more. > > > > At this point I think we can safely remove the few sccs tags that remain > > in > > the tree. The data will be there in git if we ever need it. > > > > Comments? > > Long overdue. > > Since we're removing all these tags, should we also remove what(1) and > possibly ident(1) from the tree? > > Removing what(1) should be non-controversial at this stage. I can imagine > some people may still be using ident(1) on extant Subversion systems. > > Philip > > -- > Philip Paeps > Senior Reality Engineer > Alternative Enterprises > -- () ascii ribbon campaign - for an 8-bit clean world /\ - against html email - against proprietary attachments
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ZV2P164Qhq8r7gK3>