Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:17:21 -0400 From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> To: "Jason C. Wells" <jcw@highperformance.net>, freebsd general questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Best SPF Implementation Message-ID: <43F127FD3CAC2A5AF14AC242@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <459C6C66.6010903@highperformance.net> References: <459C6C66.6010903@highperformance.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - --On Wednesday, January 03, 2007 18:54:30 -0800 "Jason C. Wells" <jcw@highperformance.net> wrote: > Which of the ports provides the best SPF implementation for FreeBSD running > sendmail? > I messed around with SPF when it was still in it's infancy. There seem to be > more choices now. I value ease of use if that is a useful discrimination. I > really need to add something to spamassasin to prevent receiving the spam in > the first place. I hate spending time on this but these guys are killing me. SPF is on the way out ... check out: <http://www.circleid.com/posts/spf_loses_mindshare/>; There are other links, but this one talks about how Earthlink has drop'd it this past year: "At about the same time, Earthlink equally quietly removed the SPF records theyd been publishing for at least a year. That was particularly surprising because SPF originator Meng Wong had been working with Earthlink to get their SPF set up. If Meng cant make SPF work, who can?" Its one of those technologies that requires everyone to adopt it to be somewhat effective ... - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFnbUx4QvfyHIvDvMRAsIMAJoCPmI86VFwoHe+eMwqrZVwKfHs/wCg3TMz 3g7sYJfrUvxKuyRxaJWvXLY= =0LFV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43F127FD3CAC2A5AF14AC242>