Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 8 May 2023 15:01:07 -0400
From:      Steven Friedrich <freebsdlouisville@gmail.com>
To:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: The port build failed claiming a runtime dependency on libmuffin.
Message-ID:  <2f04cc27-85ae-0f93-cd18-7ff93b0b0db0@Gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <21b620c0-53db-c45f-3f18-9bbcbd547c45@aetern.org>
References:  <b2f66c2c-f671-15fc-0b61-872abd0a75df@Gmail.com> <21b620c0-53db-c45f-3f18-9bbcbd547c45@aetern.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/8/23 5:02 AM, Yuri wrote:
> Steven Friedrich wrote:
>> I had installed cinnamon.  I went to the port to reinstall.  The port
>> build failed claiming a runtime dependency on libmuffin.
> You need to provide actual build output with exact errors to get any
> helpful answers.
>
>> So why is cinnamon allowed to be installed as a package without
>> libmuffin?  How is this port being built on FreeBSD's build clusters?
> The dependency is called x11-wm/muffin and it's recorded in
> x11/cinnamon/Makefile.
>
Respectfully, you're missing the point.  How can libmuffin be a 
dependency when it's not in our ports tree?  How does the freebsd team 
build cinnamon?  And why is a runtime dependency breaking a build?

-- 
FreeBSD freebsd.friedrich.org 13.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 13.2-RELEASE releng/13.2-n254617-525ecfdad597 GENERIC amd64




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2f04cc27-85ae-0f93-cd18-7ff93b0b0db0>