From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jan 17 07:52:45 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id HAA09372 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 17 Jan 1995 07:52:45 -0800 Received: from cs.weber.edu (cs.weber.edu [137.190.16.16]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id HAA09366 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 1995 07:52:43 -0800 Received: by cs.weber.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1.1) id AA26396; Tue, 17 Jan 95 08:46:39 MST From: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) Message-Id: <9501171546.AA26396@cs.weber.edu> Subject: Re: CVS stuff To: ache@astral.msk.su (Andrew A. Chernov, Black Mage) Date: Tue, 17 Jan 95 8:46:39 MST Cc: dgy@seagull.rtd.com, freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com, phk@ref.tfs.com, roberto@blaise.ibp.fr In-Reply-To: from "Andrew A. Chernov, Black Mage" at Jan 17, 95 01:20:58 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4dev PL52] Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > >Maybe the question to be asked is "do I know of any code that is used on > >FreeBSD, but isn't maintained by FreeBSD, which uses this thing". The > >answer to that question is "Yes. Lots of code is available which is not > >yet internationalized, but which is 8-bit clean except for 0x00 and 0xff". > > Terry, please, can you answer more detail then simple "Lots of code"? > Please send me program names list (used in FreeBSD, base & ports areas) > and I'll try to fix them. > Currently I don't bother about 0x00, because koi8-r and iso8859-* have > ascii-compatible lower half, so I bother only about 0xff. Well, "used on FreeBSD" doesn't necessarily imply "in ports". How about Samba? Xterm? Screen? (That last one's a trick -- it can either correctly emulate a VT100 *or* it can be internationalized, but not both, and FF is special to VT100's). The point is that as far as localization goes, our own house is far from in order, really. Terry Lambert terry@cs.weber.edu --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.