From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 6 17:24:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F8537B401 for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 17:24:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1763F43FCB for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 17:24:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.no-ip.com[66.30.200.37]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2003080700244301300kd1nie>; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 00:24:43 +0000 Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com [66.30.200.37] (may be forged)) by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h770OdKS020901; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 20:24:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: (from lowell@localhost) by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.6/Submit) id h770OdwG020898; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 20:24:39 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: be-well.ilk.org: lowell set sender to freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org using -f Sender: lowell@be-well.no-ip.com To: Ondrej Suchy References: <3F2EB70A.4030309@underground.cz> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 06 Aug 2003 20:24:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <3F2EB70A.4030309@underground.cz> Message-ID: <44vftapb5k.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: network collisions, only with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 00:24:45 -0000 Ondrej Suchy writes: > I have 4.8-RELEASE with two ethernet NIC, one is 3Com 3c905-TX using > xl driver, second is onboard Intel Pro/100 using fxp. > > The network is *very* slow via xl0 interface. scp'ing file over > 100mbit network from a host just one hop away, I get around 10 kbps > (!). Changing mediaopt from autoselect (=> full-duplex) to half-duplex > I get > slightly better results, but still very poor. Over fxp0 it is much > better, but still not perfect. Try forcing full duplex instead of letting autoselect pick it?