From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 01:18:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8049216A4CE for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 01:18:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ptb-relay01.plus.net (ptb-relay01.plus.net [212.159.14.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 296E843D45 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 01:18:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marko@freebsd.org) Received: from movens.plus.com ([80.229.231.20] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ptb-relay01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1C2gEz-000Jfc-Mt for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 01:18:17 +0000 Message-ID: <41367561.8010808@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 02:20:33 +0100 From: Mark Ovens User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 7.0 (Windows/20040901) X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <413625D0.1080004@freebsd.org> <200409011325.49247.kstewart@owt.com> In-Reply-To: <200409011325.49247.kstewart@owt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Package version problem with portupgrade(1) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 01:18:19 -0000 kstewart wrote: > Well, png is up to png-1.2.5_8 and if you did a recent cvsup and > recreated your INDEXs, that is what you should be seeing. OK, portupgrade(1) _is_ looking for 1.2.5_8 but it is trying to get it from ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.9-release/All where the version of png is 1.2.5_2, so how to resolve the conflict? Seems to me that portupgrade(1) needs to be getting the packages from packages-4-stable/All instead? > Staying behind is a good way to end up with a security black hole :). Precisely. > A cvsup of ports-all and a portsdb -uU should be a good way to keep > your system current. > Will that change where portupgrade(1) tries to get the packages from? Thanks. Regards, Mark