From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org  Tue Oct  8 17:04:09 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255F1130DD2
 for <freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
 Tue,  8 Oct 2019 17:04:09 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [18.222.6.11])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net",
 Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46nkGJ47C5z4GHc;
 Tue,  8 Oct 2019 17:04:08 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from lonesome.com (unknown [18.188.142.31])
 by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AEEB52A7C7;
 Tue,  8 Oct 2019 17:04:07 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 17:04:06 +0000
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To: Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org>
Cc: Mike Karels <mike@karels.net>, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 12.1-BETA3 won't boot on Beaglebone Black
Message-ID: <20191008170405.GA18428@lonesome.com>
References: <20191007093947.69ae5d772ebedfc1e1c98328@bidouilliste.com>
 <201910080102.x98127Jk048407@mail.karels.net>
 <20191008153417.GQ27491@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191008153417.GQ27491@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46nkGJ47C5z4GHc
X-Spamd-Bar: -
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none;
 spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of linimon@lonesome.com has no SPF policy
 when checking 18.222.6.11) smtp.mailfrom=linimon@lonesome.com
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.55 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
 RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.988,0];
 FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3];
 TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[];
 IP_SCORE(-0.26)[ip: (0.03), ipnet: 18.220.0.0/14(0.13), asn: 16509(-1.40),
 country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain];
 DMARC_NA(0.00)[lonesome.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[];
 NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.998,0];
 TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[];
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[11.6.222.18.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.2];
 R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[];
 MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:16509, ipnet:18.220.0.0/14, country:US];
 MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[];
 RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 17:04:09 -0000

On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 03:34:17PM +0000, Glen Barber wrote:
> I have seen issues with some SD cards on a few different SoCs where
> certain classes (i.e., 4) are too slow for some boards, and higher
> classes (i.e., 10) are too fast for others.

ew.  We should document this somewhere.  The potential for users
shooting themselves in the feet is too high.

mcl