From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Sep  4 01:26:43 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA22569
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Fri, 4 Sep 1998 01:26:43 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA22564
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 4 Sep 1998 01:26:41 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1])
	by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA03835;
	Fri, 4 Sep 1998 01:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
To: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com>
cc: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Compiler problems with gcc-2.7.2.1 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 04 Sep 1998 08:17:44 BST."
             <Pine.BSF.4.01.9809040812070.360-100000@herring.nlsystems.com> 
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 1998 01:25:18 -0700
Message-ID: <3831.904897518@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> It would be a good idea to upgrade to a modern compiler after the release.
> I suspect that gcc-2.8.x will be more acceptable for most people.  The C++
> support is roughly the same in gcc-2.8.x and egcs-1.x afaik.

Provided that gcc 2.8.x works or can be made to work, I'm not opposed
to this at all.

- Jordan

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message