Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 11 Apr 2008 22:09:56 -0700
From:      Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org>
To:        infofarmer@freebsd.org
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: mtree acl [patch]
Message-ID:  <48004424.3080403@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080411052305.GE81939@amilo.cenkes.org>
References:  <20080410192552.GC81939@amilo.cenkes.org> <47FEF166.6060606@freebsd.org> <20080411052305.GE81939@amilo.cenkes.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>Could you give an example of a short mtree file that includes ACLs?
> 
> Here, the parent dir and "file" have ACLs, "kk" doesn't. I
> considered "acl=none" for ACL-less files, but I think it'll
> produce more problems than use cases.
> 
> # .
> /set type=file
> .               type=dir \
>                 acl=user::rwx,user:root:rwx,group::r-x,mask::rwx,other::r-x
>     file        acl=user::rw-,group::r--,group:wheel:rwx,mask::rwx,other::r--
>     kk          acl=user::rw-,group::r--,other::r--
> ..

'kk' here should not have an 'acl' keyword at all.
Just omit it.  If someone specifies 'acl' keyword and
not 'mode' keyword, then its because they only want to
see extended ACL information.

Tim Kientzle



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48004424.3080403>