Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2022 16:21:01 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org> To: "Piotr P. Stefaniak" <pstef@freebsd.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 62d42655bca1 - main - usb(4): Substitute "unsigned int" using the equivalent and shorter "unsigned" keyword. Message-ID: <bf9cae46-5d31-e676-2640-c6b49cfdd902@selasky.org> In-Reply-To: <Y0AnxWRAH7detuol@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <202210071141.297BfcjN071407@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <Y0ASC9OXKP19xkSz@freefall.freebsd.org> <d7d3b1ef-1afe-bb84-d61c-031b3dff94c2@selasky.org> <Y0AnxWRAH7detuol@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/7/22 15:21, Piotr P. Stefaniak wrote: > On 2022-10-07 14:03:51, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: >> On 10/7/22 13:48, Piotr P. Stefaniak wrote: >>> On 2022-10-07 11:41:38, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: >>> >>>> usb(4): Substitute "unsigned int" using the equivalent and shorter >>>> "unsigned" keyword. >>> >>> Why? Just because it's shorter? >> >> Yes, just because "int" is the redundant. > > Definitely that's true for computers. In case of humans it's debatable. Would uint32_t be more clear? --HPS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bf9cae46-5d31-e676-2640-c6b49cfdd902>