From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jan 1 22:55:59 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id WAA03592 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 1 Jan 1996 22:55:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from oznet02.ozemail.com.au (root@oznet02.ozemail.com.au [203.2.192.124]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA03587 for ; Mon, 1 Jan 1996 22:55:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlyon (slmel4p10.ozemail.com.au [203.15.163.98]) by oznet02.ozemail.com.au (8.7.1/8.6.12) with SMTP id RAA18194; Tue, 2 Jan 1996 17:53:47 +1100 (EST) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 1996 17:49:41 +1100 (EST) From: Richard Lyon X-Sender: rlyon@rlyon To: Robert Nordier cc: "Garrett A. Wollman" , questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PPP glitches In-Reply-To: <199601012250.AAA00368@eac.iafrica.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Tue, 2 Jan 1996, Robert Nordier wrote: > > Do you -- or does anyone -- happen to know the exact setup to use with > iij-ppp where addresses on both side are dynamically assigned? (This must > be quite common, I would have thought.) > > Everything always works OK for the first session. But unfortunately > neither 'route delete' nor 'route flush' set everything back to the same > state as before a connection was made. > Dynamic addressing on both end ??? I though the source (you) could be dynamic but it is usual to set the destination with a fixed address. Having both ends dynamic would be useful. This would allow you to connect to a number of different destinations. Regards ...