From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 16 01:16:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 711C716A41F for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 01:16:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0580343D49 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 01:16:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so667742nzo for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 18:16:44 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=MD26ITxavzMeC6hWuNimE7YaDD+jvKvfi41zgBBlD3GICpKJ46owFjz/W4LkymIPWJ7hMPeDb196TleAO+m2QN7YWG8sD6L9ce6nKFRj4DlTDbQ3yCV3B0kVWQCgQLViQvKZ5obIGSpESqTZfR6cOamVHABStnp4mhh6Afd+Dew= Received: by 10.36.127.6 with SMTP id z6mr1214746nzc; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 18:16:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.37.20.34 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 18:16:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 05:16:43 +0400 From: "Andrew P." To: Peter Matulis In-Reply-To: <20051016000420.42095.qmail@web60022.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <003901c5d1e1$bac6e190$0101a8c0@petenet.britersen.co.uk> <20051016000420.42095.qmail@web60022.mail.yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: portupgrade -ar (why?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 01:16:45 -0000 On 10/16/05, Peter Matulis wrote: > > --- Petersen wrote: > > > Uninstalled dependancies of an installed port are irrelevant in > > any portupgrade case, as the port will automatically pull them in > as > > part of its compilation. > > What if a port now has a new dependency? > > But back to 'r', > > My system shows this: > > --------------------------------------------------- > $ pkg_info -xR openldap > Information for openldap-client-2.2.29: > > Required by: > bluefish-1.0.4 > dirmngr-0.9.2 > gnome-menus-2.10.2_1 > gnomevfs2-2.10.1_1 > gnupg-devel-1.9.19 > gtksourceview-1.2.1 > libbonoboui-2.10.1 > libgnomeui-2.10.1_1 > rox-2.3 > samba-libsmbclient-3.0.20_2 > --------------------------------------------------- > > Just to be clear on this, if I do... > > # portupgrade -r openldap-client > > ...all those listed ports will be recompiled whether they need to be > or not? That seems mighty inefficient. > > > > > > > __________________________________________________________ > Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.ca > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > > No, they won't. Honestly guys, what is this thread about? You're not gonna make portupgrade work any faster or smoother if you weed out a couple of switches from the command-line. I don't mean to bother anyone if you're having fun, but it just seems that portupgrade's manpage covers it all. If you're not sure - just try it. If something's strange - see if it's a bug, and if you're sure it is - send-pr. chat@ is the right place for topics like this one.. Cheerz, Andrew P.