Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 22:42:46 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper <youshi10@u.washington.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The Opera browser on FreeBSD Message-ID: <4577B7E6.8090605@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <200612070408.kB748Te9058812@catflap.bishopston.net> References: <op.tjbxt3hjs9c57w@daniel_goldman.hsd1.md.comcast.net> <8b4c81f0611210631q3688e71bo3a8792ef79835903@mail.gmail.com> <op.tj44rq16a2sk4b@avl.oslo.opera.com> <20061206175159.GA1265@tuatara.fishballoon.org> <20061206204612.GA3796@tuatara.fishballoon.org> <17783.14049.229575.901268@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <200612070257.kB72v7Ij012650@catflap.bishopston.net> <17783.36348.729167.27165@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <200612070408.kB748Te9058812@catflap.bishopston.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jamie Jones wrote: >> In fact, Flash 9 was announced in June. (See: >> "http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/pressreleases/200606/062806Flash9.html") > > I've looked at that. The Linux version was only released (in Beta) last month, and also, > it doesn't currently work with the linuxplugin wrapper code. > > Further more, since the FreeBSD-linux base was upgraded from rh9 to fc, my system core dumps > on EVERY linux binary I try to run, so I've not even been able to test the flash9 beta > in a linux binary-browser! > > Cheers, > Jamie What FC core are they using as the Linux base now? Just curious.. Quite a few changes were made to the kernel and base system in the FC series IIRC. Might be better to stick with a Gentoo or Debian linux base, if possible because the FC series is always changing up stuff in each release. Also, RH9 -> FC[1-5] is a move from a 2.4 kernel to a 2.6 kernel, so that may have something to play with your Linux base issues. -Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4577B7E6.8090605>