From owner-freebsd-java Sun Jan 24 14:29:58 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA26798 for freebsd-java-outgoing; Sun, 24 Jan 1999 14:29:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (sj-dsl-9-129-138.dspeed.net [209.249.129.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA26792 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 1999 14:29:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.9.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA04162; Sun, 24 Jan 1999 14:28:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Message-Id: <199901242228.OAA04162@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Nate Williams cc: java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: TowerJ for FreeBSD In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 24 Jan 1999 13:41:12 MST." <199901242041.NAA01895@mt.sri.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 14:28:31 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Linux vs. NT --- I hope that the printed version gives more info ... http://www.internetworld.com/print/1998/11/23/webdev/19981123-java.html Cheers, Amancio > > http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-08-1998/jw-08-volanomark.html > > > > Any clues as why NT's VM is so fast? > > Because M$'s JIT actually works well most of the time, unlike the > Symantec one (which Sun bundles for free with the Win32 JDK/JRE). And, > the Linux JIT's aren't 'state-of-the-art' or supported, so there isn't > much incentive to make them faster. > > > I will keep digging for the linux / nt servlet comparison. > > Thanks, I'd like to read it. > > > Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message