From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 28 8:22:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.yourfit.com (28.wxfr1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.150.61]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE04337C233 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 08:22:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from behanna@zbzoom.net) Received: from armani.yourfit.com (armani.yourfit.com [192.168.1.120]) by mail.yourfit.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA08379 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 11:22:32 -0400 Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 11:22:32 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) From: Chris BeHanna Reply-To: behanna@zbzoom.net To: FreeBSD-Stable Subject: Video card support Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I don't remember if it was this list on which I saw this discussion, or if it was hackers. Anyway, I looked at xfree86.org today, and noticed that there is accelerated support for ATI Mach64 and for NVIDIA TNT2 and GeForce256 boards, as well as many others. Is there some reason why this isn't "good enough," or do we really need actual drivers for these boards to get at their extra-nifty features (e.g., hardware backface culling, fog, bump maps, etc.)? -- Chris BeHanna Software Engineer (at yourfit.com) behanna@zbzoom.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message