Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 08:36:50 +0900 From: HASEGAWA Tomoki <thasegawa@mta.biglobe.ne.jp> To: nate@mt.sri.com Cc: y-nakaga@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp, pcasidy@worldnet.fr, freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Which LAN PCCARD for FreeBSD (no PAO!) Message-ID: <990328090313.89B79123.2381502@mta.biglobe.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <199903272106.OAA05479@mt.sri.com> References: <199903251636.RAA04214@greatoak.home> <199903270255.CAA28337@chandra.eatell.msr.prug.or.jp> <199903272106.OAA05479@mt.sri.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> Subject: Re: Which LAN PCCARD for FreeBSD (no PAO!) Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 14:06:21 -0700 Message-ID: <199903272106.OAA05479@mt.sri.com> nate> > > I would like to know which card works under FreeBSD 3.1R and FreeBSD nate> > > 2.2.8R WITHOUT PAO! nate> > nate> > Why? "plain FreeBSD"'s APM and PC-Card support is limitted and nate> > buggy. You should be use PAO. nate> nate> No no no. You got it all wrong. PAO support is buggy, FreeBSD APM is nate> good, and PCCARD support is limited. :) :) :) BUG report please :) Either native and PAO'ed FreeBSD's PCCARD support are buggy(or limited), but PAO has advances(eg. PAO can use ATA PC-CARDs, more PCIC suport, ...). So merging all PAO to native FreeBSD and developping on it is better, I think. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?990328090313.89B79123.2381502>