From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Dec 6 10:32:22 2000 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 6 10:32:19 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from beta.root-servers.ch (beta.root-servers.ch [195.49.33.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4EDE737B401 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 10:32:18 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 35290 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2000 18:32:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO WORK) (62.2.106.244) by beta.root-servers.ch with SMTP; 6 Dec 2000 18:32:13 -0000 Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 19:32:29 +0100 From: Gabriel Ambuehl X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.47 Halloween Edition) Personal Organization: BUZ Internet Services X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <695949064.20001206193229@buz.ch> To: Mike Meyer Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re[4]: Load-Balancing - any solutions? In-reply-To: <14893.65098.284631.750737@guru.mired.org> References: <14893.65098.284631.750737@guru.mired.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello Mike, Wednesday, December 06, 2000, 9:52:26 AM, you wrote: >> I'm still looking for something somewhat faster (i.e. no more than a few >> seconds lag between the master and the slave servers)... > Have you tried integrating the distribution into your source code > control system? Ever noticed how "fast" CVS is, for example? I don't want to see what's going to happen when I fed several gigs of HTML into it... > http://www.perforce.com/perforce/wcm.html >. I've got a FAQ that adds > more to this topic somewhere. If you want, I'll chase down a pointer > to it for you. Doesn't seem to be what I need. Checking against a master copy just ain't fast enough, thus the need for a push based system. Best regards, Gabriel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message