From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 09:01:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69FA116A462 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 09:01:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from janm@transactionware.com) Received: from mail.transactionware.com (mail.transactionware.com [203.14.245.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 59B9C44217 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 08:39:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from janm@transactionware.com) Received: (qmail 41622 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2005 08:42:57 -0000 Received: from new.transactionware.com (192.168.1.55) by dm.transactionware.com with SMTP; 7 Aug 2005 08:42:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 62957 invoked by uid 1026); 7 Aug 2005 08:39:28 -0000 Received: from 127.0.0.1 by new.transactionware.com (envelope-from , uid 1003) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (spamassassin: 3.0.2. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 2.464882 secs); 07 Aug 2005 08:39:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO JMLAPTOP) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 7 Aug 2005 08:39:25 -0000 From: "Jan Mikkelsen" To: "'Julian Elischer'" Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:39:22 +1000 Organization: Transactionware Message-ID: <003701c59b2b$82ff5e00$0204a8c0@transactionware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <42F57CCE.2060804@elischer.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: RE: WAN cards: Sangoma vs. Tahoe group X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 09:01:29 -0000 Julian Elischer wrote: > Jan Mikkelsen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm looking using either Sangoma cards or the Tahoe Group cards for > > connections to a frame relay network (Telstra in Australia, > for what it's > > worth). > > > > I'm comparing the Sangoma A101-U to the Tahoe 971 and the > Sangoma S5141 to > > the Tahoe 931. > > > >>From looking at the archives, people seem generally happy > with Sangoma, but > > I can't find much on the Tahoe cards and FreeBSD. The > software for the > > Tahoe cards is significantly simpler than the Sangoma Wanpipe stuff. > > > > What are the general experiences of these cards? Is anyone > actually using > > the Tahoe cards? > > If you can get a dumb sync card that runs with the sr or ar drivers > then FreeBSD has built in frame relay code. Yes, I'd like to use the netgraph frame relay code. The Tahoe 931 sync card seems to be about half the price of the other dumb sync cards I could find (eg. Digi, don't have any pricing on the WANic card). I'll take a closer look at what hardware is around. Regards, Jan Mikkelsen janm@transactionware.com