From owner-freebsd-security Wed Aug 19 12:01:49 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA06949 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Wed, 19 Aug 1998 12:01:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from axl.training.iafrica.com (axl.training.iafrica.com [196.31.1.175]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA06907 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 1998 12:01:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sheldonh@axl.training.iafrica.com) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.training.iafrica.com) by axl.training.iafrica.com with local-esmtp (Exim 1.92 #1) for freebsd-security@freebsd.org id 0z9DTQ-0005Rj-00; Wed, 19 Aug 1998 21:00:44 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: REQ: free pop3 daemon recommendations Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 21:00:44 +0200 Message-ID: <20938.903553244@axl.training.iafrica.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi folks, Having followed the bloated and eventually off-topic discussions that spawned off the qpopper vulnerability announcement, I don't recall anyone mentioning free alternatives. >From the comments that I remember, both cucipop and qpopper are horribly written and untrusted by people whose opinions I respect. The question is, can anyone with a clue recommend a free POP3 daemon that he or she considers well-written and "tight"? Ideally, something that supports the POP3 TOP command would be great, but that's not essential. To avoid the sort of off-topic crap that developed the last time anyone came near this issue, I propose that answers come to me directly (not the list) and I'll post a digest of feedback to the list. Thanks, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message