Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 3 Feb 2009 18:50:03 GMT
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To:        freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: amd64/131209: 7.1-STABLE amd64 crash
Message-ID:  <200902031850.n13Io3mn091521@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR amd64/131209; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To: Roar Pettersen <roar.pettersen@uib.no>
Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: amd64/131209: 7.1-STABLE amd64 crash
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:40:08 -0500

 On Tuesday 03 February 2009 1:02:04 pm Roar Pettersen wrote:
 > Hello !
 > 
 > > Hmm, it shouldn't be faulting here. :(  Can you do 'p m0' 'p 
 sw_rx_cons_idx'
 > > and 'p sc->rx_mbuf_ptr[sw_rx_cons_idx]'?  Also, 'x/i 0xffffffff8021d746'.
 > 
 > 
 > (kgdb) p m0
 > No symbol "m0" in current context.
 > (kgdb) p sw_rx_cons_idx
 > No symbol "sw_rx_cons_idx" in current context.
 > (kgdb) p sc->rx_mbuf_ptr[sw_rx_cons_idx]
 > No symbol "sc" in current context.
 
 You have to be at 'frame 8' for these to work.
 
 > (kgdb) x/i 0xffffffff8021d746
 > 0xffffffff8021d746 <bce_intr+710>:      mov    0x10(%r14),%r10
 
 Ok, so %r14 is presumably NULL.  Looking at the disassembly, I think m0 is 
 NULL.  This is a bug in bce(4) of some sort.  You can try e-mailing davidch@.
 
 -- 
 John Baldwin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200902031850.n13Io3mn091521>